Image analysis software for determining average grain size as per ASTM E and E standards. Edition: 97 (). Supersedes: ASTM E() Alert Withdrawn. Number of pages: Price: NOK 1 ,00 (excl. VAT) NOK 1 ,75 (with VAT). ASTM – Epdf. January 29, | Author: Gowtham Vishvakarma | Category: Micrograph, Heat Treating, Microscope, Optics, Materials Science.

Author: Tuzshura Zulkigrel
Country: Iran
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 6 April 2005
Pages: 439
PDF File Size: 12.99 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.5 Mb
ISBN: 373-2-35341-644-6
Downloads: 11615
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tuhn

Section 1 2 3 3. If the grain structure is not equiaxed but elongated, then grain size measurements on specimens with different orientations will vary. If you need to be able to add standards to the monitoring service, you must register as a user with your own username and password. Either semiautomatic or automatic image analysis devices may be utilized to perform the measurements. If the document is revised or amended, you will be notified by email.

Grain contrast 1 and tint etchants 1,2 are very effective because they generally provide full delineation of the grain structure. The benefits of a subscription: Automatic image analyzers are affected by these problems to a greater degree than are semiautomatic digitizing tablet measurements. In this case, the average number of intercepts or intersections should be at least 25 per circle.

Alternatively, a greater number of micrographs can be made and analyzed. NOTE 2—There are other procedures for dealing with grains that intersect the test area border. Excessively deep scratches, excessive relief, preparation-induced deformation, pull-out and other artifacts will produce false detail and promote inaccurate measurements.

However, no corrections are made to the size of the original test area and its relationship to the area of the grains included in the measurement is unknown. We need your help!

The final image of the grain boundaries should be thinned to a 1—2 pixel width, if possible, so that the perceived width of the grain boundaries does not significantly influence the measurement of grain intercept lengths or grain areas.


Table 4 lists the values of t as a function of n or N. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.

Delete all grains intersecting the test area border from the image so that partial chord lengths within these grains are not measured. If the histogram reveals a duplex condition, calculate s for the intercepts within each region of the distribution curve.

Also, minor deviations from equiaxed conditions may accentuate these differences. You can download and open this file to your own computer but DRM prevents opening this file on another computer, including a networked server. This procedure is useful for showing the overall mean shape of the grains but does not give size information.

Anisotropy indexes for the two perpendicular test orientations on the transverse and planar surfaces revealed values of 0. However, these techniques must be used with caution because skeletonization can produce false grain boundaries and watershed segmentation may not produce grain boundaries between two adjacent grains with similar color or gray level.

Generally, from five to twenty fields are adequate see the comments about the number of awtm or measurements required for each type of measurement described in the following sections. The square root of the pooled variance is the pooled standard deviation. The grain structure is nearly completely revealed without the twin boundaries. E3182 need your help to maintenance this website. Because of the uncertainties introduced by such procedures, they should be used with caution, or avoided, until their influence on the measurements has been determined.

If five photomicrographs are used and one placement per photograph is insufficient to produce at least counts, repeat the measurements using different regions of the same photomicrographs.


ASTM E()_图文_百度文库

When counting grain boundary intersections, which is usually easier, a tangential intersection with a grain boundary is counted as one intersection. In general, the same recommendations as in Test Methods E apply, that is, use a test circle or three concentric circles with a total line length of mm. With an inverted-type microscope, simply place the specimen face down on the stage plate and hold it in place with the stage clamps. Excessive relief, pitting or pullout must be avoided.

In such cases, the grain size must be measured on the three principal planes and averaged as described in Annex A1. For such work, follow the counting rules described in Test Methods E This ideal range may not always wstm achievable depending upon the available magnification steps, and values outside this range may be used in such cases the number of fields measured should be changed to achieve xstm counting total described in There are a number of missing grain boundaries that must be added before measurement.

ASTM – E1382.pdf

The microscopist moves the cursor across the tablet surface while watching the monitor to make the appropriate measurements. Methods based on the average grain area or the number of grains per unit area are directly related to the total length of grain edges per unit volume, LV. This measurement can be performed using field averages, as described in You need to log in before adding standards to the monitoring service. Measure entire area of the largest observed grain section.

ASTM – Epdf – Free Download PDF

Guidelines and recommended practices are given in Practice E3. The grain boundaries should be fully and uniformly delineated.

For such specimens, semiautomatic digitizing tablet measurements are preferred.